Understanding MOQ and EOQ
Two fundamental concepts in inventory management and procurement are Minimum Order Quantity (MOQ) and Economic Order Quantity (EOQ). While both dictate order sizes, they serve different purposes and originate from different sides of the buyer-supplier relationship. This guide provides a deep dive into each.
Minimum Order Quantity (MOQ): The Supplier's Rule
What is MOQ?
Minimum Order Quantity (MOQ) is the smallest quantity of a product that a supplier is willing to sell in a single order. If a buyer cannot purchase the MOQ, the supplier will not fulfill the order. This is a constraint set by the supplier to ensure that each transaction is profitable for them.
Why Do Suppliers Set MOQs?
Economic Order Quantity (EOQ): The Buyer's Formula
What is EOQ?
Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) is a formula used by buyers to calculate the ideal order quantity that minimizes the total costs associated with ordering and holding inventory. It is an internal calculation aimed at finding the "sweet spot" where the cost of ordering new stock and the cost of holding existing stock are balanced.
The Goal of EOQ
The primary goal is to minimize the sum of two major costs:
- Ordering Costs: Costs associated with placing an order (e.g., clerical costs, shipping fees, processing fees).
- Holding Costs (or Carrying Costs): Costs associated with storing inventory (e.g., warehouse space, insurance, spoilage, opportunity cost of capital).
The EOQ Formula
The formula is calculated as follows:
The total number of units the company expects to sell over the course of a year. This must be a consistent, known demand.
The fixed cost incurred every time an order is placed, regardless of the number of units ordered. Also known as setup cost.
The cost to hold one unit of inventory for an entire year. This is often expressed as a percentage of the item's cost.
Note: The EOQ model assumes that demand, ordering costs, and holding costs are all constant and known.
MOQ vs. EOQ: A Head-to-Head Comparison
| Attribute | Minimum Order Quantity (MOQ) | Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) |
|---|---|---|
| Perspective | Set by the Supplier | Calculated by the Buyer |
| Purpose | To ensure supplier profitability and cover production/fixed costs. It's a sales requirement. | To minimize the buyer's total inventory-related costs (ordering + holding). It's a cost optimization tool. |
| Nature | An external constraint or rule imposed on the buyer. | An internal calculation or guideline for the buyer's purchasing department. |
| Driving Factors | Supplier's production costs, profit margins, and logistical efficiency. | Buyer's annual demand, cost per order, and cost of holding inventory. |
| Flexibility | Generally rigid, though sometimes negotiable for large or long-term partners. | A theoretical ideal. The actual order quantity can be adjusted based on other factors (like MOQ). |
The Practical Relationship
In the real world, MOQ and EOQ interact. A buyer might calculate their ideal EOQ to be 500 units. However, if the supplier's MOQ is 1,000 units, the buyer faces a choice:
- Meet the MOQ: Order 1,000 units, which is above their EOQ. This means their holding costs will be higher than optimal, but they get the product.
- Find another supplier: Look for a different supplier with a lower MOQ that is closer to their EOQ.
- Negotiate: Attempt to negotiate a lower MOQ with the current supplier.
Therefore, EOQ is the goal, while MOQ is the reality. A savvy operations manager uses their EOQ calculation as a baseline to make informed purchasing decisions within the constraints set by supplier MOQs.
No comments:
Post a Comment